Abstract:
Researchers often face difficulties accessing printed theses and dissertations, but
electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs) have broken the access barriers. ETDs
have increased the visibility, accessibility, and reliability of scholarly work at
university libraries. The research problem in managing ETDs at university libraries
in Bangladesh remains underexplored. There is a significant absence of
comprehensive surveys to identify the challenges (i.e. technological, legal, and
administrative challenges), and to propose targeted recommendations, and also
explore the opportunities for managing ETDs in these libraries. The research
objectives were to assess the existing status, identify technological, legal, and
administrative challenges, highlight opportunities, and propose recommendations
for the adaptation of ETDs management at university libraries in Bangladesh. This
is a descriptive research; the research designed using a mixed-method approach
combining qualitative and quantitative techniques. The research data were collected
from 20 out of 55 public university libraries using a semi-structured questionnaire.
Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha has been employed for the reliability and validity
tests of the questionnaire, and descriptive statistics were employed for data analysis.
The study assessed the challenges and opportunities of ETDs management at
university libraries in Bangladesh. The findings revealed that the ETDs preservation
efforts commenced in public university libraries in Bangladesh as early as 2012.
Currently, 55% of libraries utilize ETDs management systems, while 45% remain
without such systems, for which universities are providing MPhil and PhD degrees.
Notably, Engineering University Libraries exhibit a high adoption rate of ETDs
management systems at 45.5%, surpassing other university libraries. The repository
offers both open (91%) and restricted (9%) access, primarily employing the user
friendly open-source software DSpace (91%). ETDs are preserved in PDF format,
encompassing both born-digital and digitized materials (100%). A significant
majority of ETDs repositories (81.8%) facilitate downloads, allowing users to
easily access and save desired search results on personal devices. Examining the
sources of ETDs, the study found that 72.7% originate from the Controller of
P a ge | xi
Examinations section of the university, while 27.3% are voluntarily submitted by
students. English remains the preferred language for ETDs (81.8%), with 18.2%
preserving multi-language documents. Insights into ETDs program management
reveal that 72.7% of university libraries handle resources internally, while the
remaining 27.3% are managed by the university IT cell. Agriculture university
libraries hold the largest ETDs collections (40.3%), followed by engineering
(26.6%), medical (19.3%), and general university libraries (13.7%). In terms of
professional manpower of individual universities, Engineering University libraries
lead with 51.5%, followed closely by Agricultural University libraries at 45.68%.
General university libraries show a distribution of 44% professional manpower,
while the Medical University Library has the lowest percentage at 17.24%. The
study assessed the challenges and opportunities associated with the adaptation of
ETDs in university libraries in Bangladesh. It found that Technological Challenges,
with a mean score of (M= 3.89, SD=0.40) and t(19)=9.89, p<0.01, Legal
Challenges, with a mean score of (M=4.21, SD=0.36), and t(19)=15.23, p<0.01,
Administrative Challenges, with a mean score of (M=4.22, SD=0.36) and
t(19)=14.90, p<0.01 were all significantly higher than the neutral point of M=3,
indicating that these challenges are experienced to a considerable extent. In
contrast, the Opportunities for ETDs adaptation had an even higher mean score of
(M=4.252, SD=0.22), and t(19)= 30.65, p<0.01 also significantly above M=3,
suggesting a strong perception of positive opportunities. This study will provide a
baseline for future research and policymaking, offering insights into improving
ETDs management and facilitating a successful repository in Bangladeshi
university libraries. The study has some limitations, such as a narrow participant
scope and resource constraints. This is the first time attempt in Bangladesh that will
trigger future study. Future research could explore ETDs adoption factors,
preservation technologies, and ethical concerns in digitization. The study concluded
with some recommendations based on the findings.