Abstract:
Health care services under any country's health system are a vital and phenomenal
aspect and segment. Health is a basic requirement for human beings, and usually, this
requirement must be fulfilled by a large organization like the government of one’s
country. So, the government becomes the central, authoritarian, and automatic entity
responsible for providing health care services to its people. Apart from the government,
other entities like private hospitals, institutions, and NGOs play a vital role in providing
health care services to everyone irrespective of race, ethnicity, community, gender/sex,
rich, poor, etc. This study primarily focuses on NGOs’ role in describing and exploring
access to health care services for the underserved and unprivileged people of urban
slums through conducting an integrative mixed methods design. Thus, it meant both
quantitative and qualitative methods were applied together to address the research
questions of the study, especially taking survey samples, conducting FGDs on the
greater Mirpur of three Thanas, like Pallabi, Rupnagar, and Vashantek areas of seven
slums. The aforementioned areas for this research were chosen because Greater Mirpur
is primarily populated and crowded with many slums. The sampling frame was formed
from the target population, where every household was included and given a number.
The nature of the initial survey sample or selection of households was a simple random
sample, and a simple random sample was conducted through random digit numbers
(RDNs). Then, males and females were chosen from every randomly selected
household systematically. Data was also collected through in-depth interviews
(personal interviews) from the stakeholders, doctors, executives, nurses, paramedics,
and concerned people from the responsible and related NGOs working with the people
of selected slums or study areas. A total number of respondents for the survey was
selected, 764, but 722 were found for interviews, where males were 329 and females
were 393 respondents from the slums above. 4 FGDs were carried out on the
respondents from the surveyed areas and each FGD was composed of 9, 10, 10, 11
respondents at best and 40 respondents were as participants altogether in the FGD.
Twenty in-depth interviews were conducted with doctors, administrators, programme
managers, nurses, paramedics, and community service providers working with NGOs
for the slum people.
ix
This research followed some relevant models or theories. The study followed the Health
Belief Model, Diffusion of Innovation Theory, Andersen’s Health Services
Use/Utilization Model, Parasuraman’s SERVQUAL (Service Quality) Model, and
Robert Putnam’s Social Capital Theory. These models and theories helped me
understand the central concepts of the research question and elicit answers.
Seven hundred twenty-two respondents (95%) were found in the survey out of 764
respondents from the three Thanas of seven slums, where 54.4% of respondents were
female and 45.6% of respondents were male. Age ranges (25-44) covered most
respondents (57.1%). Most of the participants (92.4%) were married, and the majority
(39.1%) of the respondents were part of ‘no education’, which meant illiterate. A more
significant portion of the respondents (34.6%) were homemakers involved in household
chores, and a vital proportion of participants (39.2%) were dependent on the income of
their husbands, sons, and wives of the households.
When considering visiting health care centres and using health care services, 31.7% of
respondents said they visited NGOs' clinics, 30.9% visited government hospitals, and
29.6% visited nearby pharmacies. The study revealed that slum people mostly visited
NGOs’ health services centres for their healthcare services.
In considering NGOs’ indoor health care services, both Caesarian and regular delivery
care (97.3% and 95.1%) held the first and second positions, respectively. Study
revealed that the antenatal or emergency maternity health facilities, with 91.9 % and
91.1% respectively, which were considered the third most health facilities confirmed in
the indoor system, and emergency neonatal and child health care, and emergency
malnourished child health care facilities had 85.2% and 79.0% respectively. The
hygienic programme became the highest choice (98.9%) of outdoor health care
services. Health and nutrition (97.0%) ranked second among outdoor services. Both
EPI and FP programmes had almost equal and close percentages of outdoor services
(92.6% and 92.8%), respectively. Postnatal, adolescent, and Reproductive health had
available facilities with (83.7%, 75.5%), child health care (67.8%), Diarrhoea and
cholera (65.0%) services were available at outdoor systems, and these services were
very common among NGOs. A qualitative study showed similar findings with more
x
detailed information regarding the NGOs’ health care services provided in indoor and
outdoor health systems for the slum people.
The study displayed that NGOs provided health care services through different systems,
and 93.1% of participants received indoor and outdoor services through static clinics.
Surprisingly, 92.3% of health beneficiaries acknowledged that CHWs/CSPs provided
their health services from NGOs. 92% of respondents found their outdoor and doorstep
health services through satellite clinics. Meanwhile, 85.2% of respondents received
health care services through telehealth and telemedicine. Telehealth and telemedicine
systems are rising through M-technology systems during the COVID-19 pandemic.
This research denoted that NGOs provided health care services for the slum people
through availability and affordability. EPI, maternal care (antenatal care, delivery care,
and postnatal care services), FP programme, child health care, and health and nutrition
programme. About 100% of respondents mentioned that EPI and ANC services were
available, and 99% confessed that delivery care services, newborn/postnatal care,
family planning, child health care, and health and nutrition care services were available
and provided by NGOS. Other available health care services provided by NGOs were
sanitation and hygiene services, adolescent and reproductive health services, diarrhoea
and TB services. Study further observed that the community service provider (40.5%)
and nearby static clinic (38.3%) were the primary regular sources of availability of
health care services. For the affordability of health care services, 94.7% of respondents
said that the most affordable service of the NGO was EPI immunization services. 93.0%
of participants considered essential medicines the most inexpensive health items. Blood
test services (89.4%), FP services (76.0%), and pregnancy strips (69.9%) were the
affordable and reasonably priced services for the underserved slum people.
The study disclosed that NGOs’ initiatives and grassroots approach impacted the use
and access to their health care services. Such impact showed through the 11 sub
variables of initiatives and the grassroots approach. The study showed that the NGOs’
initiatives (seven initiatives) and grassroots approach (doorstep services) were
significantly associated with access to health care services. The study found NGOs’
initiatives and grassroots approach’s strong and significant association with affordable
services (P<0.01), special health services (P< 0.000), doorstep services (P<0.05),
xi
engage responsible community leaders ( P<0.01), distribution of medical and medicine
items (P< 0.01), Update slum dwellers with updated information ( P< 0.05), e-health
technology (P< 0.00), BCC strategy (P< 0.05) were significantly associated with
dependent variable access to health care services. These relations indicated that NGOs’
initiatives and grassroots approach ensured better use and access to health care services
for the slum people. Qualitative findings are integrated with quantitative results,
providing more comprehensive information. Based on mixed methods integrative
findings, the study suggests that the government, donors, and policymakers synchronize
their initiatives and grassroots-level services with the NGOs so that such initiatives and
approaches, along with their services, may easily trace, reach slum people, and help
them use and access health services.
Quantitative findings were further examined by examining the associations and
differences between the health care services of the Government and NGOs through the
chi-square test of independence. These associations or differences were attempted to be
shown by socio-demographic variables when receiving health services from the
government and NGOs. The test indicated a significant association between the socio
demographic variables and visiting or receiving the Government and NGOs' health
services facilities. Especially, socio-demographic variables, sex, age, employment
status, and income, had a significant association with visiting and receiving
Government and NGOs health services facilities at the α=.01 level.
The study displayed some vital findings based on two latent concepts, ‘BCC strategies
of NGOs’ and ‘community supportive services’, by respective slum leaders. These two
concepts were not included in the main study but played vital roles in using and
accessing NGOs’ health care services. NGOs introduce and launch BCC strategies to
carry out and implement health services in rural and urban slum areas. BCC strategies
are used to curb fertility rate to prevent unwanted pregnancy, to reduce maternal and
child morbidity and mortality rates, and to utilize the EPI and FP programmes with
utmost effort. NGOs conducted BCC strategies in rural and urban slums through BCC
materials, traditional media, and social media like Facebook, WhatsApp, interpersonal
channels, communication, and community mobilization. A study conducted a multiple
logistic regression model to see the association and impact of predictors (BCC
strategies) on outcome (seeking health care behaviour/services). The study presented
xii
some BCC strategies or approaches significantly associated with the outcome variable
(visiting or seeking health behaviour or services). Out of six BCC strategies or
techniques, the study finds that predictors BCC materials (leaflet, sticker, and poster
(P<0.00), traditional media (P< 0.05), and impersonal communications (P<0.033) were
significantly associated with the dependent variable seeking health care services.
However, qualitative findings disclosed more detailed information and insights on the
prevalence and influence of social media on the attitude and practice of slum people
regarding the use and access of NGOs’ health care services. Using Facebook,
WhatsApp, and Messenger, as well as forming different groups, helped slum people
interact with one another and become aware of the NGOs’ various health care facilities.
The NGOs engage community supportive services ensured by the slum leaders who
were to provide early information relating to health care services and create a network
among the community people to share messages and information on the pandemic,
viral, and seasonal health care services. Here, the study launched a logistic regression
to demonstrate the relationships of predictors (community supportive services) with
outcomes (use, access, and seeking NGOs’ health care services). The study endeavored
to show an association of some community supportive services with using, accessing,
and seeking NGOs’ health care services. Out of four community supportive services
like access to early information on health services (P<0.012), community network to
get access to health services (P< .000) alert pandemic and other diseases (P< .020), and
convey messages to slum people for health, nutrition and hygiene awareness (P< .381)
three supportive services were significantly associated with outcome using, accessing
and seeking NGOs’ health care services. So, the study attempted to reveal that NGOs
incessantly inspired slum leaders to persuade their slum communities to seek NGOs’
health care services. Qualitative results on community supportive services lifted
quantitative findings.
The survey study uncovered findings on the respondents’ perception of the health care
services of NGOs. Respondents’ perception was considered and judged through the
rating scale/Likert scale technique. This perception was measured based on the Quality
Service Model. Respondents perception regarding the health services delivery of NGOs
was measured with some quality of services like services with promptness and less
waiting (Strongly agree 31.6%), services with affordability (20.2%), services with
xiii
strong and constant intercommunication (31.4%), listening to the health problems
(25.6%), organized and clean infrastructure (30.7%), experienced and cooperative
medical personnel (18.1%) and, promised and committed services (Agree 24.9%),
Services provided with Reliability and Responsibility (30.2%), services with available
facilities and personnel (25.8%), services with integrity and fairness (29.8%), insisting
on the care of patients (29.2%), satisfactory diagnostic and logistic supports (27.1%).
Respondents of slums believed, perceived, and confirmed that NGOs ensured the
above-mentioned quality of services while delivering health care services to the slums.
Slum people’s perception of NGOs’ health care services escalated the use and access
to health care services. Most of the slum people who received NGOs’ health services
were perceived and cajoled with NGOs' above-mentioned manners and attitude. The
percentage believed and practiced that NGOs’ employees are different from other
service providers, which propelled them to use and access NGOs’ health care services.
Qualitative findings exclusively showed from the research question “what are the new
areas of health care services or facilities undertaken by the NGOs for the slum people
of this study. Findings revealed that the different NGOs have taken different initiatives
to improve their health services and facilities. A study found that a few NGOs will
partner with the government in preventive, promotional, and surveillance steps for
COVID-19 vaccination. Others have already taken and will continue to take ‘Telehealth
and telemedicine initiatives’ conducted for the maternal services (Antenatal, delivery,
and postnatal services) during the COVID-19 and post-COVID-19. Few NGOs,
especially BRAC, are intending to launch the “Vision Bangladesh Project” for the eye
defective people at the district level with the government. The rest of the responsible
NGOs will employ and engage CHWs/CSPs with special maternal health services
training in rural and urban slums. The study demonstrated that the NGOs will provide
the CHWs or CSPs with mobile phones and install various apps to form groups to
update slum dwellers with health care messages and information. Some NGOs pledged
to provide maternity health services with ultramodern technology and introduce
multiple new diagnostic systems.
This research demonstrated NGOs’ diverse roles and functions, by which they provided
health care services to the underserved and unprivileged urban slum people. NGOs
performed their health care services through these various roles and initiatives, and
xiv
healthcare services were provided to the slum people through multiple systems. The
findings of this study revealed that NGOs carried out their services based on either
partnership services with the government or project-based services through donors or
stakeholders, and services provided to poor people through the collaboration of
domestic or local stakeholders or sponsors. The study suggested and recommended
more diverse and innovative roles and functions launched by the NGOs, the
government, and donors to ensure more updated and modern health care service
facilities for the slum people. The government should also increase and arrange more
public and private partnership (PPP) projects with NGOs, or the government should
engage NGOs with more projects like the UHCSDP to provide health care services to
the urban slum poor.