Abstract:
Background: Combating malnutrition in all of its forms has become a global health
concern. Introducing nutrition-sensitive interventions that incorporate agriculture and
health-based approaches could help to achieve food and nutrition security, improve
diets, and eventually improve nutritional status, thereby reaching the nutrition-related
Sustainable Development Goals. As previous literature revealed a lack of conclusive
evidence on the effect of integrated intervention, the purpose of the study was to
capture evidence of both short- and long-term effects of the integrated intervention on
under-five children participating in an agriculture and health-based intervention
program.
Objective: This study was an evaluation of the Integrated Agriculture and Health-
Based Interventions (IAHBI) project for improved food and nutrition security in
selected districts of southern Bangladesh. The intervention project was implemented
by the joint initiative of the government with the technical support of the Food and
Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the United Nations Children‘s Fund
(UNICEF).The overall objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of
agriculture and health-based intervention program on nutritional status among under-5
children, as well as the post implementation long-term/ sustained effects of the IAHBI
project completion using the RE-AIM framework. The specific objectives of the
present study were a) to assess the reach of the project inputs in the target population;
b) to describe the effectiveness of intervention activities (nutrition and other
intervention outcomes and IYCF indicators); c) To investigate experiences of
participants in adopting project inputs; d) to consider implementation challenges and
successes; and e) to explore the maintenance or sustainability of intervention activities
post project implementation.
Methodology: The present study was a cross-sectional mixed-method approach which
is divided into Quantitative and Qualitative phase.
Quantitative: In the secondary analysis, data from the (BRAC Institute of Global
Health (BIGH), 2013) and (Institute of Nutrition and Food Science, 2015) were
analyzed for the assessment of the effect of intervention on the nutritional status of
under-five children using Stata and Anthro 2007 software.
x
Qualitative: Initially, a review of the study "Mainstreaming Nutrition into
Agricultural Extension," referred to as "Follow up I" was carried out as part of this
PhD research work. Furthermore, in 2021, the researcher performed another primary
study titled 'Follow up II,' which focused on the long-term impact of the project
intervention using qualitative research. focus group discussions (FGD), key
informant interviews (KII), and in-depth interviews (IDI) were used to collect data
for ‗Follow up II‘ study in Shafipur and Batamara union of Barishal district. In
addition to that, Internal reports, Terminal reports and other supportive secondary
documents were also taken into consideration.
The REAIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation,
Maintenance) (Glasgow et al., 1999) (Glasgow et al., 2001) was used to evaluate the
long-term effect of the IAHBI intervention program.(Glasgow et al., 1999) (Glasgow
et al., 2001). Under the RE-AIM framework for reach domain internal report, FAO;
for effectiveness domain secondary quantitative analysis of baseline and endline
study; for adoption domain follow up I study, supported by KII findings from follow
up II; for implementation domain internal report, FAO and for maintenance Follow up
II study as well as comparison across three timelines (Endline-2015, Follow-up I-
2016, Follow-up II-2021) were considered.
Results: Based on RE-AIM framework, ‗Reach domain‟ revealed that the project
reached 31,092 beneficiaries out of 50,000 due to fund constraints. In the
‗Effectiveness domain‟, secondary analysis of quantitative findings revealed that the
prevalence of stunting (34.3% to 33.5%) and wasting (11.5% to 9.3%) were reduced
in percentage points, while underweight (30.7% to 23.9%) was significantly reduced
from baseline to endline study. According to the logistic regression model, age,
educational qualification, and wealth quintile were significantly correlated with
underweight. In addition, good practices in horticulture, hygiene, and cooking
interventions had significantly improved at the endline compared to the baseline.
. In the „Adoption domain‟, at individual level illustrates beneficiaries‘ adoption of the
intervention immediately after (almost eight months) the project completion. it was
found that most of the beneficiaries have adopted nutritional knowledge regarding
balanced diets, diversified foods, IYCF practices, dietary diversity, hygiene practices
we well as knowledge about food safety and preservation. They have also adopted pit
xi
cultivation methods and eco-friendly fertilizers, environment friendly poultry shed
and aquaculture cultivation procedure. In contrast, the 'Adoption' domain at the
organization level showed that Bangladesh government has well adopted multi-sectoral
collaboration between different ministries, which promotes nutrition security
substantially.
Most were found to sustain knowledge about nutrition education under the
„Maintenance/sustainability domain‟. Aside from providing their children with fresh
food, those who are engaged in horticulture gardening, poultry rearing, and livestock
rearing are also earning money. Those who could not afford to sustain the incentives
due to poverty had difficulty doing so. The majority of the participants revealed that
the cooking tools they received as part of the intervention are underutilized. The
majority are still engaged in income-generating activities and confident that the
community has accepted them., but they still lack decision-making capacity.
Unfortunately, there were no sustained multi-sectoral linkages between the ministries
of agriculture, livestock, and fisheries to provide services, even to the beneficiaries.
The comparison study result showed that training on food-based nutrition education
and providing incentives were helpful to improve food security, safe and healthy
cooking practices, and women‘s empowerment. Women are still practicing incomegenerating
activities and are empowered with social status and honor in society. But
regarding decision-making capacity, only female-headed households and women with
substantial income are capable of making decisions. However, home-based facilities
for the utilization and preservation of surplus food production and inter-sectoral
collaboration between implementers and ministries of government were not well
maintained.
Conclusion: Short-term results of the integrated agriculture and health-based
intervention, under ‗effective‘ domain showed a significant reduction in underweight
among children under five. Moreover, good agricultural practices, hygiene practices,
and cooking techniques were significantly improved in the endline study compared to
the baseline study. Integrated intervention programs are sustainable within a
traditional food system when local capacity and household capacity are in place to
absorb interventions and sustain their adoptionAn integrated multi-sectoral approach
was adopted in the national action plan. The multi-sectoral collaboration that was
xii
intended to improve the nutritional situation in the project area was not maintained
once the project was over. There is a need for further research to determine how to
overcome the barriers identified in the present study to improve the sustainability of
agriculture and health interventions.