Abstract:
Education is the key to scientific and technological development, employment
generation, and economic advancement (Chimombo, 2005). Quality education is the
center stage of Sustainable Development Goal Four (SDG 4) and is supported by a general
commitment to ensuring inclusiveness, equitability, and sustainability (Saini et al., 2022).
SDG 4 is a foundational goal that has an enabler role in realizing most of the other SDGs.
Seven SDGs (3, 8, 12, 13, 14, 16, and 17) are directly related to SDG 4 (Lawrence, 2020).
This study aims to conceptualize the quality of secondary business education from the
perspective of SDG 4, to identify the critical dimensions of quality in secondary business
education, and to develop a framework model for the quality of secondary business
education based on SDG 4. This study has employed a cross-sectional sample survey.
Teachers and students in secondary high schools, both government and non-government,
have formed the universe. The sample for the study has been determined systematically
through a multi-stage cluster sampling method for collecting data. Quantitative data were
collected through a validated questionnaire, and the secondary high school teachers and
students from the business studies group and head teachers were the respondents of this
research from schools of four grades- A, B, C, and D of the different types of Upazilas.
This study has developed a model for evaluating quality in secondary business
education based on SDG 4. 11 hypotheses and two mediating variables were proposed in
that research model. Data collected from different respondents focusing on the
dimensions of quality education have been analyzed using descriptive and inferential
statistics. Microsoft Excel, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software,
as well as Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) technique-
Smart PLS 4 (Version 4.0.8.9) software (Ringle et al., 2022), have been used to analyze
the data and research model. Two types of validity- ‘Convergent validity’ and
‘Discriminant validity’- were examined to assess the measurement model. The proposed
hypotheses were tested using the SEM technique to examine the structural model. Based
on the results, it can be concluded that the model is significant because most of the
hypotheses are accepted. The mediating effect of the two variables – ‘Quality of students’
and ‘Quality of Teachers’ has also been found. Based on demographic data (Gender), one
xvii
control variable is created in the structural model and tested using the bootstrapping
method. No significant gender effect on the quality of secondary business education was
found. The study also conducted an ANOVA test to examine the multigroup effects and
found substantial effects on the quality of secondary business education. This model
established some influential dimensions and subdimensions to evaluate the quality of
secondary business education. Moreover, it is straightforward to examine the relationship
among the different factors or dimensions identified in the model through the result of
path coefficients. Through the lens of SDG 4, this study has developed three emerging
antecedents of quality education: inclusive education, equitable education, and lifelong
learning. Thus, this study has filled a gap in the body of research on the quality of
secondary business education. Additionally, this research has practical implications as it
has developed and empirically tested the model within the framework of secondary
business education. At the policy level, this research will provide necessary data to
educationists, lawmakers, and secondary education administrators. As a future research
direction, this study suggests further research on the quality of secondary business
education for cross-cultural comparisons of different countries' developmental stages,
especially between developing and developed countries. This study also recommended
that future research on the efficacy of technology-driven education might be carried out
to ensure safe, effective, and sustainable technology in the classroom.