dc.description.abstract |
Background of the Study
Dhaka is the seventh most densely populated and rapidly urbanized city in the world, most of the
services provided for its citizens are administered by two city corporations, namely, Dhaka North
City Corporation (DNCC) and Dhaka South City Corporation (DSCC). As per the act, City
Corporations are responsible for the construction, development, and maintenance of foot over
bridges, reducing waterlogging, waste management, street cleaning, managing solid waste, public
parks and playgrounds, preserving traditional places, disease and mosquito control, the
establishment of city corporation schools and colleges, and ensuring access to utilities. However,
many of these services are simultaneously facilitated by some other government organizations
such as RAJUK, DWASA, TITAS Gas, BTCL, Roads and Highways, Dhaka Metropolitan Police,
Dhaka Power Distribution Company, etc. which work under the jurisdiction of various ministries.
The intra and inter-coordination among these agencies eventually becomes the indispensable
prerequisite for effective service delivery and citizens’ satisfaction. The existence of the
coordination mechanism and the gravity of its’ effectiveness are the issues of investigation in this
study.
In an effort to address coordination problems and challenges, this study has identified two very
important services or activities that are performed by service-providing agencies under the
supervision of City Corporation. In the absence of effective coordination between the City
Corporation and service-providing agencies, these services would increase the suffering of the
general people. This study investigates the role of the Dhaka South City Corporation (DSCC) in
coordinating the service-providing agencies, to be precise, two activities namely, road-cutting
activities and primary waste collection from the households. For this purpose, the role of the
agencies or organizations that have been studied are DWASA, DPDC, DESCO, BTCL, and TITAS
GAS, for road cutting study and Primary Collection Service Provider (PCSP) for waste collection.
Objectives
The objectives of the study are to evaluate the laws, regulations, and policies of service
organizations to comprehend their roles and responsibilities; to look into the extent, type, and level
of coordination between DSCC and other organizations; to look into what makes or breaks
coordination with regard to development-related road-digging activities and primary waste
collection; and to suggest ways to make coordination better.
Methods
Data were gathered using mixed methods of research which includes both secondary and primary
sources of information. Secondary sources include acts and regulations of the DSCC and other
service-providing organizations, technical reports, and other documents. Qualitative interviews
were conducted with the representatives of the DSCC and other abovementioned service-providing
agencies. In addition, a household survey was also carried out to determine the extent of the
Coordination between Service Providing Agencies in City Governance: Case of Dhaka South City Corporation
Page xi
sufferings endured by the public as a result of the lack of coordination related to road cutting and
waste collection activities, and whether general people are consulted by the city corporation or
other agencies to improve the services. The "System Building Model" and "Follett's Principle of
Coordination" are two theories that have been thoroughly examined in order to evaluate and
pinpoint the variables that affect coordination.
Major Findings
Although DSCC is supposed to coordinate all the activities performed and services provided to the
citizens of Dhaka South, it has been studied that DSCC in many cases fails to coordinate the
activities of different service-providing agencies which causes sufferings to the inhabitants. For
road-cutting activities, the implementing agency is supposed to create alternative roads or routes
for the passersby and inform the local inhabitants about the project’s start and end date but around
85% of the respondents opined that they were never informed and consulted prior to the
commencement of the project. Around 92% of the respondents believed that if they had been
informed and consulted earlier, they would have made better preparation plans and had fewer
hardships.
It was challenging to ensure coordination among them because each agency's statute grants them
ample freedom to work independently. It has been noted that dissimilar working methods
obstruct efficient coordination processes. For example, DPDC uses new procedures, high-tech
equipment, GIS-based mapping, etc. while other agencies that are involved in road cutting use
traditional methods. In the majority of cases, however, coordination between the organizations is
impossible due to the nature of the services they offer. For instance, because it is risky to work
with water and electricity simultaneously, WASA and DPDC might not be able to coordinate
their development-related digging efforts.
Recently, the Integrated Dhaka City Master Plan was established to unify and coordinate the
operations of various service-providing organizations. Although CC does send a letter to the
service-providing agencies informing them of the development activities, it has been found that in
the majority of cases, there is no involvement with DSCC during the planning and feasibility stage,
and as a result, service-providing agencies do not uphold the standards and adhere to the DSCC
master plan. Most of the road-cutting service agencies are funded by donor agencies through the
Bangladesh Government, however, the date of one organization's financing does not correspond
to the timetable of another, leading to a lack of coordination between the organizations.
In the case of primary waste collection activities, around 88 percent of the 410 families surveyed
had their domestic rubbish picked up by the third-party companies that the DSCC had given the
authority. Among them, 83% of the families had no idea how those third parties came to be in
charge of waste collection. Households claimed that waste wasn't regularly collected in about 24
percent of cases. More than 70% of residents did not know who to contact if the garbage collection
vans from the City Corporation or a third-party service failed to show up to pick up trash. It was
Coordination between Service Providing Agencies in City Governance: Case of Dhaka South City Corporation
Page xii
found that 121 of the 410 households polled knew who to complain to and had made at least one
complaint. The bulk of respondents (41.32 percent) stated they registered complaints directly to
the DSCC headquarters, while 21.49 percent said they filed complaints with the local city
corporation office.
Recently DSCC has employed several PCSPs through open tender to collect and dispose of
wastage from households and other organizations with a fee of BDT 12 lacs each year by each
PCSP, and upon meeting certain requirements, they are granted a license for one year. The
synchronization between DSCC and PCSPs has improved in recent years. Moreover, monitoring
and supervision have been upgraded at the field level.
The PCSPs are not required to organize regular monthly meetings. If anyone lodges a complaint
against PCSP, the City Corporation would convene it with the PCSP and ask them to find a solution
with the assistance of the respective ward commissioner. According to a Waste Management
Officer, no monthly coordination meetings among departments are mandatory and this study also
found that, although there is provision, PCSPs in every zone do not provide monthly or annual
reports to the DSCC, which discourages ongoing cooperation and hinders the implementation of
waste management strategy. A substantial majority of the household respondents were found to be
unhappy with the cost, employee behavior, and timeliness of waste collection. The overwhelming
majority of families thought that public participation in recruiting or renewal of PCSPs,
determination of time of service, and service fees would be very advantageous. |
en_US |