Abstract:
This study examines the relationship between social business contributions and social
transformation in the associated community. Measuring social impact is one of the
most desirable aspects of social business and related areas. Not only academic
researchers, including social business beneficiaries, practitioners, policymakers, and
governments are also keen to know about the impact of social business initiatives on
social progress. As a result, this study focuses on the socio-economic impact of social
business performance and its aftermath on society. Therefore, this study measured the
changes in the lives of the social business community people, which transpired due to
the engagement with social business initiatives.
The research mainly employed a qualitative research methodology within an
interpretive paradigm, including case studies, depth interviews, and a qualitative
survey. In this connection, this research purposefully identified some social business
case companies which were used to measure the success in changing the quality of
life of the social business community people. A multiple case study method was
preferred to thoroughly investigate the perceptions of social business stakeholders
(social business beneficiaries, social business executives, social business community
leaders) regarding social business‘s impact on society. A significant socio-economic
shift (referred to as social transformation) has been observed in the lives of social
business community people from the empirical study.
For this study, the researcher explored extensive theoretical evidence from relevant
literature and attributed 39 items including 14 variables that have direct and indirect
influences to measure the social transformation effect resulting from social business companies and their performances. Using these variables and items, the research also
administered a qualitative survey to investigate the direct and indirect influence of
social business on social transformation. The direct impacts of social business towards
social transformation comprise (i) capacity to address a social problem, (ii)
strengthening local capacity, (iii) mobilizing existing assets, (iv) continuous learning,
and (v) being able to adapt over the long-term period and the indirect evidence of
social transformation include (vi) economic effects, (vii) social and cultural effects,
(viii) demographic effects, (ix) political effects, and (x) ideological effects. A close-
ended survey questionnaire was used with 'yes,' 'no,' and 'don't know' options. Out of
350 filled questionnaires, 300 defect-free questionnaires were chosen for analysis. In
addition, for each social business case company, five higher and mid-level executives
and two community leaders were interviewed to understand their perceptions about
social transformation in the related social business community. In addition, 20 case
studies were administered based on the progress of the quality of life of social
business beneficiaries. Apart from that, some informal conversations with
beneficiaries of social business companies were also noted for the purpose of
subjective judgment of the problem at hand.
The findings of the study revealed that all social business case companies have a
significant impact in addressing specific social problems of the related social business
community, and all have been able to change the quality of life of their beneficiaries
substantially. Further, the findings confirmed that this substantial impact of social
business eventually helps people to move forward towards the overall socio-economic
transformation of the community. The important theoretical contribution of this research is the development of a
parsimonious social transformation model based on social business case studies
(success stories of the respondents). First of all, this research has effectively
generated an integrated social business model combining different social business
literature that will help people understand how social business companies work and
how it is formed. Second, this research contributes to the existing knowledge of how
people in developing countries like Bangladesh solve their specific social problems
using their entrepreneurial capacity. Third, from the social business success stories, it
has been evidenced that people at the bottom of the economic pyramid (BOP) are not
willing to remain a burden on society; a proper direction with minor financial
assistance encourages them to turn around success and socio-economic change.
Finally, it has been revealed from the case studies that the success stories of rural
beneficiaries inspire peer groups to get involved in the same way, and it transforms
their lives also with a mutual effort in due course.