Abstract:
The study on "Urban Poverty Alleviation in Bangladesh: An Evaluation of Strategies and
Programmes" was an attempt to focus on the urban poverty policies, strategies, programs,
and programmes/projects of the Government of Bangladesh and other stakeholders and
their contribution to reducing poverty in urban areas of the country. Two specific objectives
were explored under this research: firstly, to clearly identify the policies, strategies, and
programmes/projects applied in urban areas in order to alleviate the poverty of urban areas
since 1972; and secondly, to evaluate the effectiveness and contribution of policies,
strategies, and programmes/projects to alleviate urban poverty in Bangladesh. It evaluated
the policies and strategies of the government of Bangladesh and of other international
organizations, as well as programmes/projects of non-governmental organizations and
international non-governmental organizations/development partners directly focused on
reducing urban poverty, by applying an impact evaluation using the ROAMEF framework
(which refers to Rationale, Objectives, Appraisal, Monitoring, Evaluation, and Feedback and
is a simple method of stating a complex process) through an exploratory analytical approach.
A combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches was applied in this study. Data
collection tools include the HHs survey, FGDs, KIIs, and IDIs. The study found that Bangladesh
has adopted goals set by the United Nations, e.g., the MDGs and SDGs, as a baseline to
influence poverty policies, strategies, and programmes/projects in the country, which is well
documented in our recent policies, strategies, and plans. The study revealed that the
reviewed policies and strategies have clear goals and objectives and are concerned with the
public interest. However, measurable implementation tools and a balanced, holistic, and
focused approach to urban poverty are completely absent from these documents. Moreover,
the social security/safety net programmes of the government are very inadequate in both
numbers and coverage for the security of the poor living in urban areas. Likewise, NGOs,
INGOs, and development partners working directly in reducing poverty among the urban poor
provide mostly microfinance, while very few of them have programmes or projects in other
sectors, e.g., health, environment, women's empowerment, etc., where there is a huge lack
of programmes/projects on housing and education. This research explored whether programmes/projects targeted at the urban poor have positive contributions to the socioeconomic
welfare
of
the
poor
due
to
their
well-designed
nature
and
financial
support
from
various
organizations.
However,
the
contribution
is
limited
due
to
its
small
coverage,
lack
of
funds,
inefficiency in implementation, huge number of poor people, sustainability of the
project, etc. The urban poor demand extended programmes/projects that consider their
basic human rights. The selected programmes/projects not only represent positive
contributions but also show various types of gaps and lapses within them. Moreover, in some
cases, the urban poor suffer from various types of economic burdens due to the inefficient
implementation of the programmes/ projects, which requires more attention from all
concerned stakeholders.